Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Losing Weight Part II

Last time, we discussed the different studies which compared dieting low carb v.s. dieting low fat. The participants which dieted low carb lost more weight. Today, I want to elaborate on why those which dieted on low carb diets lost more weight, and how carbohydrates and fats both effect our bodies differently.


Carbohydrate- Composed of Carbon, Hydrogen & Oxygen hence the name "carbo-hydrate". They play important roles in fertilization, energy, immune system, blood clotting, and development and are broken down into 4 chemical groupings:

Simple Carbohydrates-
  • Monosaccharides- Glucose, Ribose (ATP, NAD, FAD, RNA). They are the major source of fuel for the metabolism. When not in use, they are stored as glycogen/ polysaccharides, especially in the liver and muscle cells.
  • Disaccharides- Sucrose (table sugar), Lactose (milk).
Complex Carbohydrates-
  • Oligosaccharides- Frucstose (Fruit), Vegetables, Starches.
  • Polysaccharides- Fiber, Storage of energy (starch and glycogen)

Am I turning you off with all of this organic chemistry? It will be tough to follow along, but we have a weight loss mystery to solve! We know the basics of a carbohydrate, now let us elaborate on glycogen.

Glycogen-Is the secondary form in which unused (glucose) energy is stored and most commonly stored in the liver and in our muscles. Our primary storage of energy is found in adipose tissue, or fat. How much glycogen is stored depends on how much we eat, work out, our eating habits, and our basal metabolic rate.

One thing to consider is that a carbohydrate consists of water, remember the root of the name we discussed earlier? Ever wonder why crash diets work (temporarily)? When you deprive your body of carbohydrates you are also dispelling water. The significant amount of weight that you watch drop abruptly is mostly composed of water. This is also why whenever you dismiss the unrealistic diet and begin eating normally, you immediately gain all of the water weight back (if not more).

Another important contributing factor in the consumption of carbohydrates is the Glycemic Index. Every carbohydrate has been graded its own number on the glycemic index which indicates the level at which insulin rises. The higher the GI (glycemic index) the higher the rise of insulin. When our insulin rises abruptly, it also drops abruptly, very similar to a caffeine binge. After our insulin levels substantially spike & decline, they create a desire for more of the same types of foods and often leave us very hungry. When choosing carbohydrates that are lower on the GI, we will benefit with a higher level of satiety, therefore not making us want to eat as much.

Below is a chart of different types of foods and their GI.


Of course not all carbohydrates are equal or bad for that matter. I think it is safe to say that vegetables are very essential to our overall health and we can benefit greatly by consuming them. Vegetables are a carbohydrate, so to say that all carbohydrates are bad would be a lie. It is also important to note that not all fruits are equal, some fruits are loaded with sugar and much higher on the GI.

I still feel all this research is ambiguous, we are going to have to dig deeper. Next time we will elaborate on the functions of proteins and fats.

'Carbohydrates are not necessary building blocks of other molecules, and the body can obtain all its energy from protein and fats.[11][12] The brain fats contain 37.8 kilojoules (9 kilocalories) per gram. In the case of protein, this is somewhat misleading as only some amino acids are usable for fuel.'-wikipedia





Sources:
wikipedia.com

Monday, December 12, 2011

Monday isn't Mundane!

Breakfast- Kashi cereal w/ skim milk, tsp raw honey, 1 banana
Coffee w/ skim milk
Lunch- (leftovers) 1c. salad with italian dressing, 1/4 c. spinach/artichoke dip w/ sliced baguettes
4-6 cups of hot green tea
Snack- Lunchable w/ crackers, ham, cheese, and a mini chocolate treat (hehehe)
more coffee...addict! & lots of water
Pre-Workout- 1 scoop low carb whey mixed w/ water, 10ish almonds.
Post Workout- Small apple
Dinner-Salad w/ avocado, feta, and homemade vinaigrette. Hormone free ground beef cooked with onion & seasonings, Spanish rice.


Workout-
30 Min. Elliptical, last 10 min high intensity intervals

Back-
Lateral Pulldowns 4x20 I went up to 100lbs on these
Bent Over Row w/ Barbell 3x20 (reverse grip)
Bicep Curl w/ Dumbbell 3x15
Hammer curl w/ Rope 3x15
Back extension w/ medicine ball 3x15








Blame it on the gene's!

It is very easy to become frustrated with weight loss and to simply blame it on the gene's in which we involuntarily inherited. Yes, genetic factors can force some of us to work a little more, and an elite few to work a little less but it should not be our excuse! One of our first indicators as to which type of body we have can be found using this calculator. http://www.superskinnyme.com/body_type_calculator.html

body type calculator
The calculator determines which of the 3 body types you have; ectomorph, mesomorph, or endomorph. I have not yet measured to see what category I fall in, but based on my research I would presume I am a mesomorph. The 3 categories can be summed up as easily as:

Ectomorph- The skinny girl or boy, struggles with gaining muscle mass, does not retain fat.

Mesomorph- The athletic frame which can easily make muscular gains but will never be stick thin, usually broad shouldered with narrow waist.

Endomorph- Tends to be heavy set, can build muscle but also predisposed to retain fat.




Friday, December 9, 2011

Agenda

I have added a lot of social activities to my agenda recently in efforts to promote my clothing store. Because of this I have been slacking on my gym attendance. The good news is I feel that the word is getting out about Unlabeled, the bad news is that my muscles are going to get very small if I keep this up.

Wednesday-
I trained legs with Jacqui. She found a workout on pinterest, which is like much of that we do on a regular basis, even so it is nice to not have to think a workout through every now and again.
3x15 Squats
3x25 Box Jumps (straddle)
3x20 dumbbell deadlift
3x20 weighted calf raises
3x15 lunges

+ 35 minutes of elliptical

I also had wine twice this week. Two of the events that I attended were serving wine and being the lover of wine that I am, I had to engage in a glass... or 3.
Go ahead, count 'em, only 2 days of workouts this week. AH! I am not too hung up on it, I have been a busy girl and making money is really essential to my overall survival at this point.


Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Free Food

An entire weekend has passed without me blogging and I am certain you couldn't live on. But for those of you who did survive you won't be impressed with today's writings. I didn't log what I ate this weekend, although I can tell you Sunday was dinner at nanny's and there was lots of delicious carbs and scrumptious homemade desserts that would make even the most avid of dieters cringe. Things like; deer sausage, dove, and aside from the gamey meats, sweet brownies & homemade chicken pot pie! My family is made up of avid hunters, please take me seriously when I say this, they are indefinitely...for lack of a better word... obsessed with the sport. I'm fine with it so long as I get to eat their trophies in the different forms of protein-packed deliciousness.

The great thing about my family is that I am sure to never go hungry. Someone is always bound to feed me whether it is during the holidays, on a Sunday afternoon or even just 'because'. Unfortunately, free food does on occasion have its pitfalls. Like the trash bag full of left over Panera breads that we receive from Jeff's grandpa. I know you are curious how I get truckloads full of free Panera bread, but I cannot disclose that information. Now it is really killing you, isn't it? Just know, that it is not stolen and it is given at liberty. Back to the pitfalls, why free food can be bad. It is bad because it is so easy to accept these gracious gifts and even easier to consume them, unfortunately enough, my diet cannot always benefit from the menu at hand.

So over the course of the next couple of months, I will be pulling out loaves and bagels from the freezer and eating them at my leisure. Is it the best thing for me to eat? No. Is it free? Yes. Do I make any money right now? No. Therefore I am eating all the free food I can get.

Yesterday I did 1hr20min on the elliptical, no lifting.

Saturday, December 3, 2011

Losing Weight

How does one successfully and efficiently lose weight, anyway? Is dieting in fact very gruesome and difficult, should one even follow a diet at all? What should we be eating more of; fats, carbs, proteins, etc? Exercise, do you need to do it, and if so, how much? I am on a quest to find the answers to these questions.

This abstract is from a study done to find out which method of dieting is more effective for weight loss; Low fat or low carbohydrate. The conclusion was that both diets proved similar overall results in weight loss and macro nutrient distribution is not relevant to overall weight loss. Macro nutrients being; fats, carbohydrates, and proteins.

This study compares low-carbohydrate diets to low-fat diets, with more participants dismissing the study in the low-fat diet, they concluded a low-carb diet might be more sustainable long term. Also, a greater amount of weight was lost on a low carb diet (12.9 v.s. 6.7%) after 24 weeks. On the low-carb diet, triglycerides decreased and lipo protein cholesterol levels increased.

Another study confirms that low carbohydrate diets are more effective than low fat diets over a short period of time, in this instance, 6 months. The participants lost18.7lbs v.s. 8.58lbs. There was no follow up observance done to monitor weight changes post-dieting.

Alright, we stand at 2:0 with low-carb dieting taking the lead. So let us now poke and prod our way into the realms of exercise. This next study compares men who ran(exercised) and men who Dieted (decreased their calorie consumption) over the course of one year.
Exercise V.S. Diet
Dieters lost 17lbs, 4.6lbs of this was lean mass (non fat)
Runners lost 10lbs, 1.5lbs of this was lean mass (non fat)

Dieters lost more weight although 27% of the weight was lean mass. Runners lost 53% less weight than dieters, but only 1% of the weight lost was lean mass. Could we argue then, that the men who exercised also gained lean body mass (muscle)? I think so, but feel free to form your own opinion! But, just to expand on the topic we should look at another article.

This abstract says that dieting produces more overall weight loss than that from exercising. However, the weight that is lost from dieting does include a substantial amount of lean body mass or muscle. The abstract continues by stating exercise helps with weight distribution but it is not the best formula for weight loss alone.

I personally think, it is the combination of both exercise and nutrition. Which still, leaves open the question of which types of exercise are better; cardiovascular (aerobic) or weight resistance lifting (anaerobic)? We'll save that for next time as I feel we have still yet to conclude what the perfect macro nutrient balance is and how our hormones come into the picture.

Friday!

Shoulders

3x15 shoulder press w/ dumbbells
3x20 side lateral raise w/ dumbbells
3x20 rear delt fly on the pec deck
3x20 Upright row w/ barbell
3x20 rear delt pull w/ cables
3x20 front lateral raise w/dumbbells


No cardio!

Food

Breakfast- 2 whole eggs w/ cheese, onion, spinach and 1/3C. steel cut oats w/ raw honey, and walnuts. (Jeff made breakfast so measurements are approx.) coffee w/ skim milk & splenda

Lunch- Ezekial bread natural peanut butter/no sugar added jelly sandwich, 2C. Vegetable soup

another coffee but with powder creamer & splenda, lots of water

Snack-Tbsp peanut butter, 1C. Mixed fruit (pineapple, mango, papaya)

Pre-workout- 1 scoop protein w/ water

Dinner-2.5 pieces of Tombstone frozen pizza, 1 mini reeses cup, lots of sweet potato fries with barbecue sauce.

I definitely overdid it on the sweet potato fries, they are SO good though- I really couldn't resist. I will say that dinner was post workout so at least my body absorbed those carbohydrates!

Thursday, December 1, 2011

Thursday, already?

The Food:

Breakfast- 2 whole eggs with a smidge of shredded cheese and sauteed spinach in oil, and coffee w/ skim milk & splenda.

Lunch- Mason jar of raw spinach, one boiled egg, sliced red bell pepper, raw organic dressing and one scoop low carb protein mixed with water.

lots of tea n' water

Snack- 10 almonds & Tbsp. natural peanut butter

Snack #2- Mason jar of raw spinach, one boiled egg, sliced red bell pepper, raw organic dressing, 2 Tbsp peanut butter

Dinner- Split a single order of beef fajitas with Jeff. 2 corn tortillas, no cheese, no chips.

No workout.

Minnesota Starvation Study

There is so much information out there that knowing what to eat is so confusing! I was taught calories in v.s. calories out in my nutrition class in college, 'burn more calories than you eat and you will lose weight' they said. It was that simple? Wow! I will just eat less and work out more, by creating a deficit I would always lose weight. Fantastic-doesn't matter what I eat, as long as I eat 'less'.

Well, if that was true, then how come after my last competition, I ate WAY less than what calories I burned off during exercise, but still remained fat? Why wasn't I losing weight? Why was I essentially, getting fatter!?

I was simply surviving, my body thought I was trying to kill it through starvation, it had every reason to want to 'hang on' for its life, to collect every nutrient from every food I ate. I basically starved myself for two years, exercised like an anorexic maniac, and when I wouldn't lose weight I simply did-you guessed it- decreased my calorie consumption (ate less) and increased my calorie expenditure (exercised more). Talk about nonsense, I continued to do the very thing that was destroying my metabolism.

God made our bodies so perfectly, that the entire system and functions of which we are constructed is just mind baffling. He built us, so that we might survive the most treacherous of conditions.

A few years ago, I researched 'til my eyes bled and came across this study; the Minnesota Starvation Study of 1944-1946. 36 healthy men participated in a 3 phased study in which the first phase consisted of 12 weeks of observations; both physiological and psychological. The second phase was the diet phase, the 36 men were put on extreme calorie restricted diets along with extended amounts of exercises over a period of 24 weeks. During this time, scientists observed many psychological and physiological changes to the bodies & minds of these men. An average of 25% of weight was lost (which would be 45lbs on an man of 180lbs). The third and final phase was used to re-nourish the participants, nursing them back to adequate health.

Control period- (12 weeks) Men consumed around 3,200 calories, although slight alterations were made so that all men would be close to their needed daily maintenance calories and ideal weight. At the end of 12 weeks it was shown that the men were slightly below their 'ideal' weight and psychological exams all deemed the men with normal, healthy brain function.

Semi-Starvation period- (24 weeks) Calories were cut to around 1,560

Restricted Recovery- (12 weeks) Where diet was controlled for recovery.

Unrestricted Recovery-(8 weeks) Where diet was not controlled and men were allowed to eat as they wish. Most instances, the men ate excessive amounts of food.
'Enough food must be supplied to allow tissues destroyed during starvation to be rebuilt ... our experiments have shown that in an adult man no appreciable rehabilitation can take place on a diet of 2000 calories [actually 2000 kcal (8368 kJ)] a day. The proper level is more like 4000 [4000 kcal (16,736 kJ)] daily for some months. The character of the rehabilitation diet is important also, but unless calories are abundant, then extra proteins, vitamins and minerals are of little value (20).' Keys noted on recovery.

The results? Post dieting the men had severe signs of depression, lack of sexual interest, and in one case a man even amputated 3 of his own fingers, without recalling if it was an accident or purposeful. There was a significant preoccupation with food, decline in concentration, comprehension, judgement, and social isolation/withdrawal from society. There was reduction in the metabolism, reduced body temperature, reduced heart rate, and edema (swelling). When the men were allowed to eat what they wanted, they went to the extreme and binged.

'I don’t know many other things in my life that I looked forward to being over with any more than this experiment. And it wasn’t so much ... because of the physical discomfort, but because it made food the most important thing in one’s life ... food became the one central and only thing really in one’s life. And life is pretty dull if that’s the only thing. I mean, if you went to a movie, you weren’t particularly interested in the love scenes, but you noticed every time they ate and what they ate.' From one of the participants in the study.


You can read more about the study here:http://jn.nutrition.org/content/135/6/1347.full


So, from this experiment we gather that nutrition has an impact on more than just our weight. Are you surprised? I truly believe that food can both save and kill us. If you think about it, most of our prescriptions are derivatives of plants and many foods in their most natural state have benefits to help with ailments or sickness. Even marijuana is known to help with curing depression, pain, and anxiety.

And these men did 'rebound' just as I did:
' None of the men remembered being provided with detailed instructions for recommended diet or activities after they left, and all agreed that they were not "back to normal" after the 3-mo rehabilitation period. Although they were warned to be careful not to overeat on d 1, they were free to eat as they wished. Henry Scholberg remembered being taken to the hospital to have his stomach pumped because he "just simply overdid." Harold Blickenstaff was sick on the bus on the way back from one of the several meals he had d 1; he found that he simply "... couldn’t satisfy [his] craving for food by filling up [his] stomach." Many also reported eating excessively after they left Minnesota; Jasper Garner described it as a "year-long cavity" that needed to be filled. Many, like Roscoe Hinkle, put on substantial weight: "Boy did I add weight. Well, that was flab. You don’t have muscle yet. And get[ting] the muscle back again, boy that’s no fun." Estimates for how long it took to fully recover ranged from 2 mo to 2 y, but none of the men believed there were any negative long-term health effects from participation. '

References: